Analyst Challenge – Game State Evaluation, July 23

The “game state evaluation” challenge asks you to look at a snapshot from a game and assess which team is “in the lead”, by how much, and why. To do this, you need to ask yourself about each team composition’s win conditions, and determine which pieces of information are most relevant.

July 23, 2019 Challenge

This challenge was from 14:35 of the past weekend’s game between Origen and Vitality.

The Responses

Here’s the multi-tweet response from Cody Gerard:

Executioner Ken agreed that Origen was in the lead:

Heartlock, a pro analyst, wrote a nice thread as well:

The Actual Outcome

In the end, Vitality pulled out the victory, despite the analyst consensus that they hadn’t been achieving their win conditions coming out of the early game. VIT executed better vision control and were more proactive than Origen throughout the game, which was possible because of their map priority and tempo advantages. Ideally, that priority and tempo would have produced more early kills, but the subtle advantages of vision and map control still paid off, and Origen weren’t able to take advantage of their scaling to overtake that control later in the game.

Origen made some macro mistakes that contributed to the loss, most notably exposing themselves to the Baron plays by placing Nukeduck in bottom lane with his Teleport on cooldown. Credit goes to Vitality for recognizing those openings and forcing the plays around Baron, then executing well enough in team fights to manufacture the win.

Join the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.